Carboxymethylcellulose
Emulsifier/Thickener
GastrointestinalInflammation
Description
Carboxymethylcellulose, often listed as Cellulose Gum (E466), is a common food additive derived from plant cellulose, such as wood pulp. It has no nutritional value and is used as a thickener, stabilizer, and emulsifier to improve the texture and consistency of many processed foods. In fast food, it is frequently found in sauces, dressings, shakes, and baked goods to provide a creamy mouthfeel, prevent ingredient separation, and control ice crystal formation in frozen desserts . While major global regulators have long considered it safe, recent scientific studies have raised concerns about its potential to negatively affect gut health by altering intestinal bacteria.
Learn More Dossier
Aliases / Common Names:
Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, Cellulose Gum, Sodium CMC, Carmellose, E466, INS 466.
Regulatory Status & Exposure:
Major global bodies, including the U.S. FDA (GRAS status) and WHO/JECFA (ADI "Not Specified"), consider CMC safe based on evidence that it is not absorbed by the body. An EFSA re-evaluation in 2018 found no safety concern at current use levels . This traditional safety assessment is now challenged by research focusing on the gut microbiome. A pivotal 2021 human trial used a dose of 15 g/day, a high but potentially achievable exposure for individuals with diets rich in processed foods.
Technical Evidence:
The foundation of CMC's safety status—that it is inert because it is unabsorbed—is contradicted by recent findings. Animal studies since 2015 show CMC can disrupt the gut's protective mucus layer, alter the microbiome, and promote low-grade inflammation and metabolic syndrome. These concerns were elevated by a 2021 human controlled-feeding study where healthy volunteers consuming CMC experienced altered gut bacteria, a depletion of beneficial metabolites (e.g., short-chain fatty acids), and, in some individuals, bacterial encroachment into the gut lining—a hallmark of inflammatory disease . Furthermore, a large 2023 cohort study associated higher CMC intake with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease.
Fast-Food Context:
CMC is used to thicken sauces (McDonald's Tangy BBQ Sauce), prevent ice crystals in shakes (Burger King soft serve), and bind breadings (McDonald's Fish Filet Patty). Fast-food meals often contain a "cocktail" of multiple emulsifiers and thickeners (e.g., polysorbate 80, carrageenan, xanthan gum), whose combined effects on the gut microbiome are unstudied.
Sensitive Populations / Notes:
Individuals with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) or a predisposition to gut inflammation may be particularly susceptible to CMC's effects. Safety data for infants under 16 weeks of age is lacking, a data gap noted by EFSA.
Regulatory status
United States
Allowed
Food (human consumption); GRAS listing under GMP.
Basis: 21 CFR 182.1745
Source
European Union
Allowed
E466 authorized in multiple food categories (category-specific conditions apply).
Basis: Efsa Opinion
Source
International
Allowed
international food standards GSFA Table 3 (GMP) and additional category notes.
Basis: Jecfa Evaluated
Source
JECFA
Allowed
Food additive specifications and toxicological position (ADI not specified).
Basis: Jecfa Evaluated
Source
Canada
Allowed
Authorized in specified foods per incorporated-by-reference list (dated 2025-10-20).
Basis: Other
Source
Australia
Allowed
Permitted in multiple processed foods (GMP), per FSANZ documentation and Code framework.
Basis: Jecfa Evaluated
Source
Registry review date: 2026-02-19
State policy updates
California (US)
Not Applicable
Not regulated by this act (AB 418).
Effective: 2027-01-01
Compliance: 2027-01-01
Source
Policy timeline
-
2023-02-02 — AB 418 introduced (California Food Safety Act) — CMC not identified as regulated substance in chaptered law.
(California (US))
-
2023-10-07 — AB 418 chaptered (Chapter 328, Statutes of 2023) — bans 4 named substances; CMC not included.
(California (US))
-
2027-01-01 — AB 418 compliance date for prohibited substances (not applicable to CMC).
(California (US))
Research Evidence Snapshot
ACUTE SENSITIVITY HAZARD
Confidence: Medium
Low
Rare hypersensitivity reports exist primarily for medical/injectable contexts; food allergy signal appears uncommon in reviewed sources.
CHRONIC HEALTH EVIDENCE DIRECTION
Confidence: Low
Mixed/heterogeneous
Regulators conclude low toxicity at permitted uses, while emerging microbiome-focused evidence (short-term high-dose RCT; animal/mechanistic studies) and some observational associations suggest potential effects in some contexts.
EVIDENCE STRENGTH
Confidence: Medium
Limited
Extensive toxicology database supports low systemic toxicity; human causal evidence at typical dietary exposure remains limited (few RCTs; mostly short-term/high-dose).
REGULATORY POSTURE (U.S.)
Confidence: High
Authorized/Permitted
Listed in 21 CFR §182.1745 as GRAS when used under GMP.
REGULATORY DIVERGENCE
Confidence: Medium
Moderate
Broad allowance in US/international food standards/EU with GMP/common authorization; additional scrutiny and category-specific caution in infant/FSMP contexts in EU.
HEALTH-BASED GUIDANCE AVAILABILITY
Confidence: High
Established
ADI 'not specified' (JECFA) and EFSA 'no numerical ADI needed' conclusions exist.
EXPOSURE CERTAINTY
Confidence: Medium
Low
Food concentrations are rarely public (especially for restaurant foods); exposure assessments depend on assumptions and incomplete use-level reporting.
DATA RECENCY & STABILITY
Confidence: Medium
Evolving
Core regulatory status is stable; microbiome-focused research and some policy actions in sensitive categories continue to develop.
Found in these Restaurants
We found this ingredient in menu items at the following chains:
Methodology
We assign the Low / Limited Concern tier using published research, regulatory guidance, and PRūF’s additive taxonomy. Restaurant usage is derived from public ingredient disclosures and mapped to menu items where this additive appears.
Browse all restaurant audits
Related questions and pages
Regulatory context
Learn how this additive is treated across different regulatory frameworks and why mixture effects can matter.
Scientific Sources & References
-
Application A1047: CMC as an additive in wine — Risk/Technical Report (includes CAS, ADI-not-specified definition, and GI/allergenicity notes)
FSANZ • 2011
-
Re-evaluation of celluloses E 460(i), E 460(ii), E 461, E 462, E 463, E 464, E 465, E 466, E 468 and E 469 as food additives (EFSA Journal)
UK_FSA • 2018
-
Randomized controlled-feeding study of dietary emulsifier carboxymethylcellulose reveals impacts on the gut microbiota and metabolome
PEER_REVIEWED • 2022
-
21 CFR §182.1745 — Sodium carboxymethylcellulose
FDA • 2026
-
GSFA Online Food Additive Details: Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (Cellulose gum) (INS 466) — Provisions and functional classes (updated to 48th CAC session, 2025)
CODEX • 2025
-
Opinion on sodium carboxy methyl cellulose (E 466) in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow-up of re-evaluation for all population groups (EFSA Journal)
UK_FSA • 2022
-
FAO JECFA Monographs 11 (2011): Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose — specifications (CAS 9004-32-4; ADI not specified for modified celluloses)
JECFA • 2011
-
Commission Regulation (EU) 2025/666 of 3 April 2025 amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 as regards the use of celluloses (E 460-466), including E 466 sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (cellulose gum)
EU • 2025
-
AB 418 (2023-2024) Chaptered 10/07/2023 — California Food Safety Act (does not list sucralose in HSC §109025)
STATE • 2023
-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carboxymethyl_cellulose
-
https://thewholetruthfoods.com/learn/twt-chemx/e466-or-sodium-carboxymethyl-cellulose-or-cellulose-gum
-
https://www.inchem.org/documents/jecfa/jeceval/jec_2138.htm
-
https://www.cspi.org/chemical-cuisine/carboxymethyl-cellulose-cmc-cellulose-gum-sodium-carboxymethyl-cellulose-cmc
About this Audit
Data sourced from publicly available nutrition guides and ingredient lists as of 2026-03-04. Percentages represent the frequency of an ingredient's appearance across standard menu items, not the quantity within a specific item. Regional availability and supplier formulations may vary.
PRūF is an independent educational tool and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to any restaurant chain mentioned. All trademarks belong to their respective owners.